The Scientific-Technological Revolution -- CRISPR -- Doudna -- May 15, 2026

 

Query:

I think it's important not to forget the word "INDUSTRIAL" in these four revolutions. Walter Isaacson in his biography of CRISPR / Jennifer Doudna mentions three great revolutions of modern times: a) first half of 20th century: Einstein, the atom --> nuclear power and nuclear weapons; b) second half of 20th century, information technology (BITS) --> microchip, computer, and digital revolution; and c) first half of 21st century, which he suggests is an even more momentous era, advances in understanding of the genetic code. Was Walter Isaacson somewhat unique in going down that road -- three great revolutions of modern times, or did he take that from some other author(s) or another book(s)? 

 Reply:

Walter Isaacson did not invent this framework, nor is he unique in using it. He popularized a highly specific version of a well-established macro-historical thesis. The concept that modern history is driven by sequential waves of physical, digital, and biological science is borrowed directly from several prominent futurists, economists, and thinkers.

Isaacson himself traced the intellectual ancestry of this framework back to Jeremy Rifkin and Klaus Schwab. The concept of "Atoms, Bits, and Genes" can be traced back to other notable authors: 

1. Nicholas Negroponte: The Shift from Atoms to Bits 

• The Source: Being Digital (1995). 
• The Idea: Negroponte, the co-founder of the MIT Media Lab, famously mapped the massive economic shift of the late 20th century as a transition from processing atoms (physical manufacturing) to processing bits (digital information). Isaacson adapted this direct terminology to frame his transition from the "Atom" era to the "Bit" era.

2. Jeremy Rifkin: The Biotech Century 

• The Source: The Biotech Century (1998). 
• The Idea: Long before CRISPR was discovered, Rifkin argued that the 21st century would be defined by the convergence of computers (infotech) and gene editing (biotech). He explicitly stated that the digital revolution of the late 1900s was merely the operational infrastructure required to organize the looming genetic revolution of the 2000s.

3. Klaus Schwab: The Fourth Industrial Revolution 

• The Source: The Fourth Industrial Revolution (World Economic Forum, 2016). 
• The Idea: While Schwab uses the "Industrial" framing you noted, his exact breakdown of our current era relies on a tripartite taxonomy: 

• the Physical, 
• the Digital, and 
• the Biological. 

Isaacson's three revolutions map cleanly onto Schwab’s structural pillars of modern technological evolution.

4. Freeman Dyson: The Dual Revolutions

• The Source: Our Biotech Future (New York Review of Books, 2007). 
• The Idea: The legendary physicist argued that the 20th century was dominated by the materialist sciences (the atom and the silicon chip), but that the 21st century would belong to domestication of biotechnology. He wrote extensively on how the tools of the digital era would ultimately serve as the catalysts for mastering the biological realm.

Why Isaacson Framed it Differently 

By stripping away the word "Industrial," Isaacson shifted the focus from how factories produce goods to how human intellect alters reality.

• Physics (The Atom): Gave us dominion over energy and matter.
• Computer Science (The Bit): Gave us dominion over data and communication.
• Biotech (The Gene): Gives us dominion over life itself.

By framing these as scientific revolutions rather than strictly factory floor shifts, Isaacson created a narrative bridge that allowed him to transition from writing about Albert Einstein and Benjamin Franklin, to Steve Jobs and the digital innovators, and finally to Jennifer Doudna.

**********************
The Scientific-Technological Revolution (STR)

a